US Judge Allows Potential Damages For Distress Of Boeing MAX Victims

This was the second of two MAX crashes that together claimed 346 lives.

“A jury could reasonably infer from the evidence that will be presented at trial that the passengers on ET 302 perceived that they were going to crash, horrifically, to their certain death,” said Alonso, a district judge in the Northern District of Illinois.

A trial is set to begin on June 20.

Boeing had argued that victims’ families should not be able to seek compensation because the MAX victims had no time to suffer, as they died immediately.

But Alonso said: “There is sufficient evidence to support a reasonable inference that these passengers experienced pre-impact fright and terror.”

“Therefore, the Court is not inclined to bar evidence of how contemplation of that emotional distress affects the plaintiffs’ grief,” he added.

He ruled that surviving family members can seek damages for their emotional pain, due to the particular distress their loved ones experienced in their final moments.

Robert Clifford, an attorney representing victims’ families, applauded the ruling.

“Boeing’s victims undeniably suffered horrific emotional distress, pain and suffering, and physical impact and injury while they endured extreme G-forces, braced for impact, knew the airplane was malfunctioning, and ultimately plummeted nose-down to the ground,” he said in a statement.

“We look forward to upcoming trials to present this evidence to a jury and ensure Boeing is held fully accountable,” Clifford added.

A Boeing spokesperson said the company is “deeply sorry” to the victims’ families.

“We acknowledged the terrible impact of these tragic accidents and made an upfront commitment to fully and fairly compensate every family who suffered a loss,” the company said.

Boeing added that it has kept its commitment in recent years as it settled “a significant majority of claims” and will continue to work to constructively resolve the remaining cases.