Entertainment
Zuku Ordered to Pay Sh7.2M for Illegally Airing Kenyan Film Pwagu
Wananchi Group Limited, trading as Zuku, has been ordered to pay Sh7.2 million in damages for illegally broadcasting the Kenyan film Pwagu without authorization.
The case, Kadi Media Limited vs Wananchi Group Limited, stemmed from a complaint by Kadi Media Limited and filmmaker Diana Mbogo, who alleged that Zuku infringed their copyright by airing Pwagu on its TV platform without consent.
The claimants sought an injunction to halt further broadcasting, special damages of Sh2,217,951, general damages, and costs, citing unauthorized use of their audio-visual work.
to this verdict began with a High Court order on November 4, 2024, transferring the case from Justice C.W. Meoli to the Copyright Tribunal.
Despite Zuku’s initial challenge to the tribunal’s jurisdiction, a ruling on November 28, 2024, affirmed its authority under Section 26(3) of the Copyright Act and Article 169(1)(d) of the Constitution.
Kadi Media provided robust evidence, including certificates from the Kenya Copyright Board and the Kenya Film and Classification Board, proving their ownership of Pwagu’s literary and audio-visual rights.
Zuku admitted to airing the film, claiming it acquired the content from Sparks Corporate Solutions Limited, a third party that warranted no infringement on third-party rights.
However, the tribunal found Zuku’s due diligence lacking, noting that the unsigned, undated agreement with Sparks held no legal weight.
Furthermore, minutes from a June 2024 meeting revealed that Zuku aired unapproved content, undermining their defence.
that Zuku violated Section 35 of the Copyright Act by broadcasting Pwagu without a valid license or assignment from Kadi Media.
Despite a demand letter on May 30, 2024, Zuku continued airing the film, dismissing the claims as defamatory.
The tribunal rejected Zuku’s reliance on Section 35(5)(b), which protects unaware infringers, as Zuku was aware of the copyright but relied on faulty third-party assurances.
Citing precedents like Kimani v Safaricom Limited (2015) and Royal Media Services Limited v John Katana (2019), the tribunal awarded Kadi Media Sh2,217,951 in special damages for production and administrative costs, supported by extensive documentation.
in general damages was granted to compensate for the harm caused by Zuku’s unauthorized broadcast to its wide viewership.
However, exemplary damages were denied, as Zuku had ceased airing the film post-dispute.
Costs and interest on the awarded sums were also granted, effective from the judgment date until fully paid.
Kenya Insights allows guest blogging, if you want to be published on Kenya’s most authoritative and accurate blog, have an expose, news TIPS, story angles, human interest stories, drop us an email on [email protected] or via Telegram
-
Investigations1 week agoCement, Cash and Courts: How the Hashu Dynasty Crushed the Ramji Brothers for Fourteen Years and Why the Walls Are Now Closing In
-
Business4 days agoInside NCBA’s Decline: How a Banking Giant Lost Its Strategic Edge
-
Business3 days agoStandard Chartered Ghosts Haunt Joshua Oigara At Stanbic As Whistleblower Spills Beans
-
Investigations1 week agoInside The Urban Planning Cartel That Owns Nairobi
-
Africa2 days agoSouth Sudan: Adut Salva Kiir’s Shadow Treasury Exposed
-
Investigations2 weeks agoBetika Faces DCI Probe, Directors Arrest and License Revocation Over Massive 29.5 Million Safaricom Customers’ Data Breach
-
Investigations1 week agoFresh Move Launched to Remove Kenya Railways MD Mainga From Office After Awarding Sh817 Million Consultancy Contract
-
Africa3 days agoThe President’s Daughter and The Missing Witness: How Adut Salva Kiir’s Shadow Treasury Silenced Its Most Dangerous Critic
