Questions As Governor Natembeya’s Security Is Withdrawn

Questions have been raised after authorities reportedly withdrew the official security detail of Trans Nzoia Governor George Natembeya.

Natembeya said that security officers manning his home and the guards attached to him were withdrawn on Wednesday at 12:00 am.

The county boss said there was no explanation offered to him over the developments. As per the law, the governor is entitled to security who are supposed to accompany him and guard his homes.

“We do not know why. Ask them and let them explain,” he said.

There was no immediate comment from the police. National Police Spokesman Michael Muchiri said he was out of the country but would inquire to get details of the claims.

The developments follow attacks on the governor on Saturday, November 22, after armed goons ambushed him at Chwele Ward in Kabuchai, Bungoma County, while he was on a campaign trail.

Several cars were destroyed in the drama with gunshots renting the air. Police also intervened using tear gas canisters to disperse the governor and his supporters.

The said goons also attacked Kabuchai Member of Parliament Majimbo Kalasinga’s residence.

Viral images and videos showed Natembeya’s vehicles destroyed, with the county boss alleging that he was shot at several times after the goons stormed the rally.

Natembeya alleged that a top political leader was using government machinery to settle political scores.

“This is so primitive; it is not politics. Sending goons to come and destroy the home of a member of the National Assembly…because they have a different political opinion is primitive,” he said.

Many believe the withdrawal of the security is linked to the ongoing political contest in the western region and the pending by-elections in the area on November 27.

Natembeya’s allies condemned the move, calling it a calculated attempt to intimidate him ahead of political events in the region.

Some Trans Nzoia leaders warned that withdrawing security from a sitting governor is not only unlawful but could set a dangerous precedent for handling political disagreements in the country.

Civil society voices also raised concerns, noting that executive security is guaranteed under law for governors as state officers.

On the other hand, a section of government-affiliated leaders have downplayed the claims, suggesting the move may not be political and that the governor should “allow institutions to clarify the matter.”