Gladys Wanga Defends Sh500,000 Cost of Two-Door Pit Latrine

Homa Bay Governor Gladys Wanga has defended her county government’s expenditure of approximately Sh500,000 on the construction of a two-door pit latrine, telling senators that the amount reflects standard costs associated with such projects in parts of the county.

The issue emerged during a session of the Senate Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Tuesday as the governor responded to audit queries touching on county expenditure and pending bills.

The cost of the sanitation facility drew scrutiny from lawmakers, particularly after Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna questioned whether taxpayers had received value for money.

Responding to the concerns, Wanga maintained that the figure was neither unusual nor inflated.

“The standard cost is about half a million shillings. That covers excavation and construction,” she told the committee.

According to the governor, the final cost can vary depending on the terrain and site conditions, with some projects costing slightly less. She said difficult ground conditions in certain areas of Homa Bay can significantly increase excavation expenses.

The explanation, however, quickly sparked debate both inside and outside the Senate chamber, with many Kenyans questioning how a basic pit latrine could attract such a substantial price tag at a time when counties are facing growing financial pressures.

The matter arose against the backdrop of broader audit concerns facing the county government, including questions surrounding pending bills reportedly running into billions of shillings.

While construction costs often vary depending on location, design specifications, labour charges, materials and geological conditions, the Sh500,000 figure has generated intense public discussion, particularly on social media, where users compared it with the cost of similar facilities built in schools, health centres and rural communities across the country.

The Senate committee sought further clarification on procurement procedures, project specifications and whether the expenditure represented value for money.

The debate highlights a recurring challenge in county governments across Kenya, where questions over project costs frequently trigger concerns about efficiency, procurement practices and prudent use of public resources.

For critics, the issue is not simply the cost of a toilet but whether public funds are being spent effectively amid competing demands in sectors such as healthcare, education, water and agriculture.

Supporters of the county administration, on the other hand, argue that infrastructure costs cannot be assessed in isolation without considering site-specific factors, engineering requirements and compliance with public construction standards.

The Auditor-General’s findings and the Senate committee’s review are expected to provide further clarity on whether the expenditure was justified and whether the county obtained value for the money spent.

As scrutiny of county spending intensifies, the Sh500,000 latrine has become the latest symbol in the ongoing national debate over accountability, transparency and the management of devolved funds.