Tag: BBI report

  • What Ruto means with his ‘plastic support’ for the BBI document

    What Ruto means with his ‘plastic support’ for the BBI document

    The politics around the handshake and BBI were designed to corner the Deputy President Dr. William Ruto as the enemy of ‘unity’ as well as to paint him as a very corrupt politician.

    That resulted to the continued bitter bickering between DP Ruto and ODM leader Raila Odinga who are likely to face off in the 2022 elections.

    But Ruto made a peculiar shift from opposing to supporting BBI report, making BBI a document that will just pass without ‘juice’. Exactly what Raila and Uhuru had not planned for, they have been left punching the air.

    He will miss BBI rallies and at the same time deny his enemies the opportunity to use the rallies as a major scheme to gauge Raila’s sway ahead of 2022 since majority may not participate except some few sycophants who will rise and vote it.

    Appearing to support the document also saves the DP’s 2022 budget that President Uhuru Kenyatta and Raila Odinga had trapped him to waste on leading No campaigns but hustlers are known for avoiding impulse at all costs.

    Ruto is also ‘supporting’ the document fully aware that it was set to act as Raila’s springboard to 2022 presidential race with the secretariat already headed by Raila’s Mohamed Junet.

    Plots are also underway to have the secretariat turned into Raila’s 2022 campaign secretariat, meaning Ruto cannot be ‘a legit member’ of that team.

    The possible beneficiaries of a million positions Odinga is drumming for in the a bloated executive and parliaments are in there to draft how senior positions will be shared thereafter.

    The DP has been reading too much mischief in BBI to give it ‘a legit support’, he even called for reviews but Uhuru and Raila gave called him a bluff.

    He will take a low profile once the campaigns kick off to force Uhuru and Raila to hawk BBI to the less interested public.

    Raila Odinga (c) with BBI secretaries Junet Mohamed and Dennis Waweru (right) [p/courtesy]
    Ruto’s camp is also informed that BBI is setting stage for the rigging of the 2022 polls. He cannot vote in a process that is purely designed to shoot down his ambitions.

    Boycotting the referendum will then confuse his enemies who are dying to gauge his strength, an opportunity he will deny them through a low turn-out since no one is opposing Raila’s BBI.

    Having no one to oppose the BBI will have the Uhuru and Raila exposed to explain to the public how the bloated cabinet and decision to hold the referendum amid the covid-19 will benefit this broke country.

    Ruto recently hosted 150 Mps and senators at his Karen residence to make known their irreducible minimums in supporting the unpopular document.

    What Ruto is doing is not any different from what Raila did when boycotted repeat presidential polls in 2017.

    Raila’s baby cry was that the same IEBC that he wants to pass BBI now was against reforms then and that Jubilee had also changed election laws days to election.

    But Ruto is also well aware that the dynasty members will unleash state machinery to force the document through.

    He avoided a gruesome contest to focus on 2022 when he is most likely to face a betrayed, stressed and heartbroken Odinga in the polls.

    This also presents a better opportunity to avoid a direct face off with Uhuru Kenyatta because he still intends to widen the inroads he has made into the president’s backyard in Mt. Kenya region.

     

     

     

  • Steve Ogolla: Analysis Of The BBI Report

    Steve Ogolla: Analysis Of The BBI Report

    Image result for bbi report"
    President Uhuru Receiving the BBI Report Photo|DN

    The BBI Report is a terrible anti-climax and carries mixed results. This thread will interrogate those recommendations. Broadly, the recommendations do not reflect the urgency, influence, and prominence that supported its mandate.

    The proposal to create the position Prime Minister is a huge PR exercise intended to alter the optics without meaningful drive towards political inclusion. The proposed PM is nothing more than a super CS drawn from the same government. This proposal must be rejected.

    The proposal that the runners up in a presidential election be the Leader of Opposition reintroduces the problem of personalization of power. Must be rejected. The present approach of the second best-performing party supplies the Leader of Minority in Parliament is more inclusive.

    The recommendation that gender representation be achieved through party lists is not new thinking. There’s a court order to that effect. But the law still anticipates gender top up where the ballot does not return such number of women to meet the 2/3 gender threshold.
    The idea that the private sector should recruit for public service ostensibly to promote inclusivity (equal chance regardless of ethnic extraction) is untenable in the law. The National Employment Authority is best placed to oversight public service recruitment and placement.
    The recommendation to develop a 50-year plan to achieve shared prosperity is a curious and abrupt adjustment to Vision 2030. Shared prosperity, at the minimum, has to do with equitable sharing of available resources and prudent and parsimonious use of those resources.
    The proposal to reward whistleblowers with 5% of the loot is a curious recommendation and is inconsistent with civic virtues. Incentives for whistleblowing will have the reverse effect of undermining national ethos, and values.
    The recommendation that corruption be fought through public wealth declarations and resignations is a welcome move. A curious omission is a recognition that corruption is best fought at the ballot.
    The proposal to increase county revenue allocations from the present 15% to 35% minimum is a welcome boost for devolution. If there’s political consensus, this will be BBI’s biggest win. Devolution carries the better potential for promoting financial and political inclusion.
    The proposal to disband IEBC is abrupt, illegal and unconstitutional, and must be rejected. Firing commissioners who enjoy protected tenure by altering the law to circumvent constitutional procedures for removal amounts to political interference with the independence of IEBC.
    The proposal to have politicians influence the appointment of IEBC commissioners is illegal and unconstitutional and must be rejected. The proposed mixed model approach will alter the approach in the constitution. The constitution supports the neutral expert approach.
    The constitution requires a settled approach of political neutrality at the IEBC and all constitutional commissions. This means insulation from politics, as opposed to inoculation/injecting politics at the IEBC.
    If we alter the neutral expert approach in favour of the mixed model approach/IPPG format, there’s the risk of interfering with the architectural integrity of the constitution (distorting the balance and stability in the constitution).
    The second problem with injecting politics into IEBC is the lack of a settled culture of political morality. ODM supported nominees to IEBC could change loyalty midway an election and deepen the crisis at the IEBC and plunge the country into chaos.
    The proposal to teach good manners and learn about different cultures in the formal education system is an excellent investment for the future. — In the end, BBI’s biggest win is strengthening devolution. It has neglected the Judiciary and promised to weaken IEBC.
    Here are the highlights of the Building Bridges Initiative Report as published by the chief editor of this site. https://kenyainsights.com/key-highlights-of-the-bbi-report/