News
Obado Has A Case To Answer In The Death Of His Girlfriend Sharon Otieno, Court Rules
Sharon and her unborn baby were killed on the night of September 3, 2018, in Homa Bay County.
The High Court Thursday ruled former Migori Governor Okoth Obado and two co-accused persons have a case to answer in the murder of university student Sharon Otieno.
Sharon and her unborn baby were killed on the night of September 3, 2018, in Homa Bay County.
Obado, along with Michael Oyamo and Caspal Obiero are facing charges related to the brutal killing of the expectant university student in 2018.
On November 8, 2024 parties completed final submissions in the case, with Obado arguing that the prosecution failed to present a strong case against him.
Through his lawyers Kioko Kilukumi and Rodger Sagana, the former governor submitted that he had an open relationship with Sharon Otieno and was willing to support her and their unborn child.
The defence also argued that there is no legal basis for charging murder in relation to a foetus, asserting that murder charges apply only to a person who has been born alive.
The prosecution led by Gikui Gichui and Allan Mulama concluded its case against the accused last year (2024) with the testimony of investigating officer Moses Ole Sena.
A total of 42 witnesses testified in the six-year-old case.
Obado’s lead lawyer senior counsel Kioko Kilokumi asked trial judge Cecilia Githua to find that the former Migori governor has no case to answer.
The prosecutors asked the court to find that Obado, his former personal assistant Michael Oyamo and a former Migori county employee Caspal Obiero have a case to answer and should be put on their defence.
They presented evidence showing that Oyamo is the one who allegedly liaised with Sharon on the fateful day before she rode in a vehicle that drove her to the death field in Homa Bay.
Justice Githua made her ruling Thursday.
Justice Githua said the evidence adduced by the Prosecution established that a prima facie case had been made to warrant the three being placed on their defence.
The Judge was in agreement with submissions made by the defense that by virtue of born alive principle which state that for a child to be a victim or anyone to be accused of murder, that child must be born alive.
“I have considered these submissions and I am in agreement that indeed the evidence adduced by the Prosecution in support of baby Sharon doesn’t support the charge of murder,” she said.
Kenya Insights allows guest blogging, if you want to be published on Kenya’s most authoritative and accurate blog, have an expose, news TIPS, story angles, human interest stories, drop us an email on [email protected] or via Telegram
-
Investigations2 weeks agoInside Nairobi Firm Used To Launder Millions From Minnesota Sh39 Billion Fraud
-
News2 weeks agoPastor James Irungu Collapses After 79 Hours Into 80-Hour Tree-Hugging Challenge, Rushed to Hospital
-
Business2 weeks agoMost Safaricom Customers Feel They’re Being Conned By Their Billing System
-
News2 weeks agoUnfit for Office: The Damning Case Against NCA Boss Maurice Akech as Bodies Pile Up
-
News2 weeks agoTax Payers Could Lose Millions in KWS Sh710 Insurance Tender Scam As Rot in The Agency Gets Exposed Further
-
News2 weeks agoDeath Traps: Nairobi Sitting on a Time Bomb as 85 Per Cent of Buildings Risk Collapse
-
News2 weeks agoRaila Bodyguard Maurice Ogeta Appointed As Mombasa Security County Adviser
-
Investigations6 days agoKERRA Homa Bay Region Manager Calvince Thomas Accused of Swindling Businessman Ksh 2 Million in Phantom Tender Deal
